On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:34:11PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Midway through the recent "RT patch acceptance" thread, someone mentioned
> > > that it might be good to summarize the various approaches. The following
> > > is an attempt to do just this, with an eye to providing a reasonable
> > > framework for future discussion.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Errors? Omissions?
> >
> > I haven't finished it, but it looks great so far. Are you planning to
> > repost it to LKML, or otherwise publish it somewhere, after incorporating
> > feedback?
>
> Glad you like it!
>
> I figured on sending out an update sometime next week, after incorporating
> feedback.
I believe you are too friendly to vanilla + CONFIG_PREEMPT. People are
still seeing tens or hundreds of ms bumps.
Does the LTP include an RT latency test yet?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
