06/11/2005 01:04 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote/a écrit:
Just a small change to "1 - QoS":
b. For each service:
i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software,
ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
to the hardest possible hard realtime.
I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the
beginning of the section):
Probability of not missing any deadline due to software
Good catch! How about the following?
i. Probability of meeting a deadline due to software,
ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
to the hardest possible hard realtime.
Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting".
It sounds strange to me (but english is not my mother tongue), it's like
hardware was not so good but software helped to recover the situation
and, eventually, the deadline was met ;-)
What about using the way you wrote it at the beginning of the section:
"Probability of missing a deadline only because of a hardware failure"
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
