On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote:
> I've read the whole summary and really appreciated it. It's clear,
> precise and objective.
Glad you like it!
> Just a small change to "1 - QoS":
>
> >b. For each service:
> >
> > i. Probability of missing a deadline due to software,
> > ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
> > to the hardest possible hard realtime.
>
> I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the
> beginning of the section):
> Probability of not missing any deadline due to software
Good catch! How about the following?
i. Probability of meeting a deadline due to software,
ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
to the hardest possible hard realtime.
Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting".
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks again for writing this summary,
> Eric
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
