Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>]

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Eric Piel wrote:
> I've read the whole summary and really appreciated it. It's clear, 
> precise and objective.

Glad you like it!

> Just a small change to "1 - QoS":
> 
> >b.	For each service:
> >
> >	i.	Probability of missing a deadline due to software,
> >		ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
> >		to the hardest possible hard realtime.
> 
> I think it should be (by reference to how you define probability at the 
> beginning of the section):
> Probability of not missing any deadline due to software

Good catch!  How about the following?

	i.      Probability of meeting a deadline due to software,
		ranging from 0 to 1, with the value of 1 corresponding
		to the hardest possible hard realtime.

Changing "missing" in the original to "meeting".

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks again for writing this summary,
> Eric
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/