On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:37:24PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:26:48PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > > Bill, I know PREEMPT_RT is something you root for strongly. FWIW, however, > > such statements are usually counter-productive. > > Some of the comments from various folks are just intolerably paranoid > and I'm frustrated by that. Oh god, http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4721170330.html The original thread and the summary got posted to "linuxdevices" today. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Prev by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Next by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Index(es):
 |