On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:15:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 23:09, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:40:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > (...)
> > > - Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.0
> > > + Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
> > (...)
> > > then you just add a line saying
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Why not change this slightly to something like :
> >
> > DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <[email protected]>
> >
> > which would imply that this person has read (and agreed with) version 1.1 ?
> >
>
> Ugh, that's ugly, long and redundant. You could have:
>
> DCO-m.n: Random J Developer <[email protected]>
>
> but it still looks ugly.
Well, it could be anything ugly. The advantage of keeping the "Signed-off-by"
is that tools which already rely on this string will still find it.
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
