Linus, On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:40:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: (...) > - Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.0 > + Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 (...) > then you just add a line saying > > Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <[email protected]> Why not change this slightly to something like : DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <[email protected]> which would imply that this person has read (and agreed with) version 1.1 ? Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- References:
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Prev by Date: Re: route procfile problems
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] ima: related Makefile compile order change and Readme
- Previous by thread: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Next by thread: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
- Index(es):
 |