Re: [PATCH] kernel <linux-2.6.11.10> kernel/sched.c

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Chen Shang <shangcs@gmail.com> wrote:

> /*===== ISSUE ====*/
> My second version of patch has a defect.
> 
> +  if (unlikely(old_prio != next->prio))             {
> +      dequeue_task(next, array);  --> ### dequeue should against
> old_prio, NOT next->prio ###
> +      enqueue_task(next, array);
> +  }

indeed...

> unforunately, dequeue_task does not accept the third parameter to make
> adjustment. Personally, I feel it's good to add extra function as my
> first version of patch to combine dequeue and enqueue together.
> Reasons as following:
> 1) adding the third parameter to dequeue_task() would cause other
> places' code change;
> 2) for schedule functions, performance is the first consideration.
> Notice both dequeue_task() and enqueue_task() are NOT inline.
> Combining those two in one saves one function call overhead;

the real problem comes from recalc_task_prio() having a side-effect, 
which makes requeueing of tasks harder. The solution is to return the 
prio from recalc_task_prio() - see the tested patch below. Agreed?

	Ingo

--

micro-optimize task requeueing in schedule() & clean up 
recalc_task_prio().

From: Chen Shang <shangcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- linux/kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static inline void __activate_idle_task(
 	rq->nr_running++;
 }
 
-static void recalc_task_prio(task_t *p, unsigned long long now)
+static int recalc_task_prio(task_t *p, unsigned long long now)
 {
 	/* Caller must always ensure 'now >= p->timestamp' */
 	unsigned long long __sleep_time = now - p->timestamp;
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static void recalc_task_prio(task_t *p, 
 		}
 	}
 
-	p->prio = effective_prio(p);
+	return effective_prio(p);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static void activate_task(task_t *p, run
 	}
 #endif
 
-	recalc_task_prio(p, now);
+	p->prio = recalc_task_prio(p, now);
 
 	/*
 	 * This checks to make sure it's not an uninterruptible task
@@ -2751,7 +2751,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
 	struct list_head *queue;
 	unsigned long long now;
 	unsigned long run_time;
-	int cpu, idx;
+	int cpu, idx, new_prio;
 
 	/*
 	 * Test if we are atomic.  Since do_exit() needs to call into
@@ -2873,9 +2873,14 @@ go_idle:
 			delta = delta * (ON_RUNQUEUE_WEIGHT * 128 / 100) / 128;
 
 		array = next->array;
-		dequeue_task(next, array);
-		recalc_task_prio(next, next->timestamp + delta);
-		enqueue_task(next, array);
+		new_prio = recalc_task_prio(next, next->timestamp + delta);
+
+		if (unlikely(next->prio != new_prio)) {
+			dequeue_task(next, array);
+			next->prio = new_prio;
+			enqueue_task(next, array);
+		} else
+			requeue_task(next, array);
 	}
 	next->activated = 0;
 switch_tasks:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/