Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 May 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > + if (current == next_thread(current)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Single thread case without the use of any locks.
> >
> > A nitpick, but wouldn't be it clearer to to use
> > thread_group_empty(current)?
>
> The thread ist needs to contain only one element which is current.
> thread_group_empty checks for no threads.
I think that thread_group_empty() means that there are no *other*
threads in the thread group, that means that we have only one thread.
In any case (p == next_thread(p)) == thread_group_empty(p).
But it is a very minor issue indeed, let's forget it.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
