Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process

Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +		if (current == next_thread(current)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Single thread case without the use of any locks.

A nitpick, but wouldn't be it clearer to to use
thread_group_empty(current)?

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: hostap gone from 2.6.12-rc4-mm2?
• Next by Date: Re: hostap gone from 2.6.12-rc4-mm2?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Optimize sys_times for a single thread process
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]