On Wed, 18 May 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + if (current == next_thread(current)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Single thread case without the use of any locks.
>
> A nitpick, but wouldn't be it clearer to to use
> thread_group_empty(current)?
The thread ist needs to contain only one element which is current.
thread_group_empty checks for no threads.
Do we need a new macro?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]