On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:04, Con Kolivas wrote: > Andrew please consider for inclusion in -mm It looks like I missed my window of opportunity and the SMP balancing design has been restructured in latest -mm again so this patch will have to wait another generation. Carlos, Markus you'll have to wait till that code settles down (if ever) before I (or someone else) rewrites it for it to get included in -mm followed by mainline. The patch you currently have will work fine for 2.6.11* and 2.6.12* Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgpWu8AodCtdo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: [email protected] (Carlos Carvalho)
- Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: [email protected] (Carlos Carvalho)
- [SMP NICE] [PATCH 1/2] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option
- Next by thread: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- Index(es):