On Wed, 11 May 2005 17:20, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ack on the first patch - but please dont make it a .config option! > Either it's good enough so that everyone can use it, or it isnt. Makes a heck of a lot of sense to me. I guess I was just being paranoid / defensive for no good reason. The first patch alone should suffice. Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgpQUjlXwJnqM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- Prev by Date: [patch] v4l: saa7134: mark little endian ptr
- Next by Date: Re: [Fastboot] kexec+kdump testing with 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- Previous by thread: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH 2/2] SCHED: Make SMP nice a config option
- Next by thread: Re: [SMP NICE] [PATCH] SCHED: Implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP
- Index(es):