Con Kolivas ([email protected]) wrote on 16 May 2005 21:33:
>On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:04, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> Andrew please consider for inclusion in -mm
>
>It looks like I missed my window of opportunity and the SMP balancing design
>has been restructured in latest -mm again so this patch will have to wait
>another generation. Carlos, Markus you'll have to wait till that code settles
>down (if ever) before I (or someone else) rewrites it for it to get included
>in -mm followed by mainline. The patch you currently have will work fine for
>2.6.11* and 2.6.12*
That's a pity. What's more important however is that this misfeature
of the scheduler should be corrected ASAP. The nice control is a
traditional UNIX characteristic and it should have higher priority in
the patch inclusion queue than other scheduler improvements.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
