Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:

> > -#!/usr/bin/python
> > +#!/usr/bin/env python
> >  #
> >  # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
> >  # v0.4b "oedipa maas"
> 
> Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what 
> env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal 
> behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.

Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call
results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it....

Attachment: pgpj0vzdo6byT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
• Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]