On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 EDT, Bill Davidsen said: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote: > > -#!/usr/bin/python > > +#!/usr/bin/env python > > # > > # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM > > # v0.4b "oedipa maas" > > Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what > env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal > behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries. Most likely, his python lives elsewhere than /usr/bin, and the 'env' call results in causing a walk across $PATH to find it....
Attachment:
pgpj0vzdo6byT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- References:
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- Prev by Date: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
- Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- Index(es):