Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended

> I agree this can be a bit kludgy, so if you want add another solution.

Patch is ok for me, but you have a good chance of having broken
other archs too due to the string.c changes. Probably needs some testing.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
• Next by Date: Re: stuffing characters to keyboard buffer.
• Previous by thread: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended
• Next by thread: Setting the hardware clock together with the system one(was: Re: [patch 1/1] x86_64: make string func definition work as intended)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]