Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

[Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>]

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > Mercurial is ammenable to rsync provided you devote a read-only
> > repository to it on the client side. In other words, you rsync from
> > kernel.org/mercurial/linus to local/linus and then you merge from
> > local/linus to your own branch. Mercurial's hashing hierarchy is
> > similar to git's (and Monotone's), so you can sign a single hash of
> > the tree as well.
>
>
> Ok fine. It's also interesting how you already enabled partial transfers
> through http.
>
> Please apply this patch so it doesn't fail on my setup ;)
>
> --- mercurial-0.4b/hg.~1~	2005-04-29 02:52:52.000000000 +0200
> +++ mercurial-0.4b/hg	2005-04-30 00:53:02.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -#!/usr/bin/python
> +#!/usr/bin/env python
>  #
>  # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM
>  # v0.4b "oedipa maas"

Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what 
env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal 
behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries.

--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/