Re: [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:45:51AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This removal should have happened last month.

Thanks. I believe I2O and s390 are still using it though. The I2O patch
is pending somewhere and s390 will hopefully catch up. 

-Andi

> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |    8 -
>  fs/compat.c                                |   90 ---------------------
>  include/linux/ioctl32.h                    |   22 -----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

References:
- [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
Next by Date: Re: The return of PWC
Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] {,un}register_ioctl32_conversion should have been removed last month
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]