Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
> But this makes, like "register", direct use of processor registers (it
> stores int arguments in eax, ebx, etc.).

No. It make _unlike_ "register", direct use of processor registers.

The "register" keyword does _not_ use processor registers. It's just 
syntactic fluff, and tells the compiler exactly one thing:

 - that the compiler should warn if you take the address of such a thing.

In addition, the compiler may generate code that takes it into account, 
which most likely means _worse_ code than if it didn't take it into 
account.

In contrast regparm() actually says something very relevant: it says that 
the function uses a totally different calling convention.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux