Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:

The "git" didn't try store small variables, which aren't referenced, in the processor registers. It also didn't use the size_t type. I corrected a C++ style comment too.


What kind of ancient C standard are you working against?

// isn't "C++" any more, and "register" variables are sooo 60's, man.

Pass the toke,

		Linus

"register" and "auto" variables aren't relicts of the 60's, they're a part of the ISO-C 99 standard, I'm following, "man".

And if you think "register" variables are outdated, please remove the CONFIG_REGPARM option from the Kernel source.

Removing a "//" comment makes sense in this case because a "//" comment between hundrets of "/* */" comments looks extremly ugly and shows that the source is "patchworked" and unstructured.

Today a lot of people forget about the basic rules of coding. You too. :)

Matthias-Christian Ott

Literature:
[1] Dr.-Ing. Ludwig Claßen, Dipl.-Math. Ulrich Oefler: Unix und C: Ein Anwenderbuch; VEB Verlag Technik Berlin; 1990 [2] Erik de Castro Lopo, Peter Aitken, Bradley L. Jones: Teach Yourself C for Linux Programming in 21 Days; SAMS Publishing; 1999

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux