Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
> The "git" didn't try store small variables, which aren't referenced, in 
> the processor registers. It also didn't use the size_t type. I corrected 
> a C++ style comment too.

What kind of ancient C standard are you working against?

// isn't "C++" any more, and "register" variables are sooo 60's, man.

Pass the toke,

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
    • From: Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
    • From: Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: returning non-ram via ->nopage, was Re: [patch] mspec driver for 2.6.12-rc2-mm3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] JFS fsync wrong behavior when I/O failure occurs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]