On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:59:42 +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott said: > And if you think "register" variables are outdated, please remove the > CONFIG_REGPARM option from the Kernel source. I think you fail to understand the difference between what CONFIG_REGPARM does (namely, controlling the way parameters are passed to function calls) and what the 'register' declaration does.... > [2] Erik de Castro Lopo, Peter Aitken, Bradley L. Jones: Teach Yourself > C for Linux Programming in 21 Days; SAMS Publishing; 1999 Umm.. Yeah. "Teach yourself FOO in 21 days". Quite the outstanding authority to cite. Gotta love the publisher too.. ;)
Attachment:
pgpgABc7Fhptg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- From: Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- From: Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>
- [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- Next by Date: Re: Hotplug CPU and setaffinity?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH GIT 0.6] make use of register variables & size_t
- Index(es):