Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:


* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:


2/5

The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.

We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  ^^^

Thanks.



if the previous 'remove degenerate domains' patch would go away then this patch needs to be merged/modified. (and most of the others as well)


I probably should respin this so it goes in *first* anyway.
Rather than doing half in the remove degenerate domains and
half here.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux