Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2/5

> The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
> runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.
> 
> We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
> no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]