Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> * Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 2/5
> 
> > The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
> > runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.
> > 
> > We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
> > no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

if the previous 'remove degenerate domains' patch would go away then 
this patch needs to be merged/modified. (and most of the others as well)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]