Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:10:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:38:34 +0200 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Nack. The generic sys_time still writes to int, not long.
> > That is why x86-64 has a private one. Please keep that.
> 
> It writes to a time_t which is a __kernel_time_t which is a long on
> x86-64, isn't it?

At least in 2.6.10 it writes to int.


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] CryptoAPI & Compression
• Next by Date: RE: 2.6.11, USB: High latency?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]