On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:38:34 +0200 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nack. The generic sys_time still writes to int, not long. > That is why x86-64 has a private one. Please keep that. It writes to a time_t which is a __kernel_time_t which is a long on x86-64, isn't it? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpza1BFSoLQx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
- References:
- Prev by Date: RE: 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process not scheduled?
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] CryptoAPI & Compression
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
- Index(es):
 |