Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:10:59 +1000
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <20050330173216.426CFEFECF@zion> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:38:34 +0200 Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Nack. The generic sys_time still writes to int, not long.
> That is why x86-64 has a private one. Please keep that.

It writes to a time_t which is a __kernel_time_t which is a long on
x86-64, isn't it?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpza1BFSoLQx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process not scheduled?
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] CryptoAPI & Compression
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux