Re: The assignment of numerical addresses for Domain Names ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Ed;
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 09:23 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> > 
> > My question is quite narrow.  I am not looking for generalized
> > explanations of IPv4.  

> Use "whois" to glean information...
> 
> egreshko@misty winXPPro-EN]$ whois 64.71.255.198
> [Querying whois.arin.net]
> [whois.arin.net]

> OrgName:    Rogers Cable Communications Inc.
> OrgID:      RCC-104
> Address:    One Mount Pleasant
> City:       Toronto
> StateProv:  ON
> PostalCode: M4Y-2Y5
> Country:    CA
> 
> NetRange:   64.71.240.0 - 64.71.255.255
> CIDR:       64.71.240.0/20
> NetName:    ROGERS-CAB-104
> NetHandle:  NET-64-71-240-0-1
> Parent:     NET-64-0-0-0-0
> NetType:    Direct Assignment
> NameServer: NS2.YM.RNC.NET.CABLE.ROGERS.COM
> NameServer: NS2.WLFDLE.RNC.NET.CABLE.ROGERS.COM
> NameServer: NS3.YM.RNC.NET.CABLE.ROGERS.COM
> NameServer: NS3.WLFDLE.RNC.NET.CABLE.ROGERS.COM
> Comment:
> RegDate:    2004-03-08
> Updated:    2006-12-05
> 
> OrgTechHandle: IPMAN-ARIN
> OrgTechName:   IP MANAGE
> OrgTechPhone:  +1-416-935-4729
> OrgTechEmail:  ipmanage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
Yes. I have used whois or jwhois.  I guess just by looking at
64.71.255.198 I can't tell much, but have to use whois to find out more.
I was wondering if say, all Broadcast companies are grouped as
64.70.xxx.xxx to 64.90.xxx.xxx or some such scheme -- but I guess not.
Not much point to it, on thinking about it.

-- 
Regards Bill;
Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3
Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux