Re: Logwatch message

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Logwatch message
• From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:24:03 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 09:52 -0400, Neal Wilkinson wrote:
> What does this mean? 
> 
> 1 Time(s): eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner
> capability of 45e1.
> 
> My nic isn't full duplex. It's a Linksys and doesn't support it. 
> 

What do you mean "doesn't support it"?  AFAIK all modern NICs support
full duplex, and my Linksys certainly does.

The message means exactly what it says. The NIC successfully negotiated
a full duplex connection to the switch.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Logwatch message
    • From: Neal Wilkinson

• References:
  • Logwatch message
    • From: Neal Wilkinson

• Prev by Date: Re: Fedora & Ndiswrapper & Mimo Wireless
• Next by Date: Re: patching a crashed hard drive
• Previous by thread: Logwatch message
• Next by thread: Re: Logwatch message
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread