Re: Patching 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Patching 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7
• From: R L <fedora26@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:52:53 -0400
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=GIkvFf/vpH3Z/SHwCz5YmClBYmjjlsnIHtf3UwlVe24gig39acHMADzgWiJIv/PgYMRxFi8ebM/Jk4iaOa1d/wmjM3PuYEKsgPHf0bmZZTXnKk8v31HzGvSV0cqtkmARqBg1mMxVV+N0cSxtG7zu5EFuIdRByfms8on03psUkK8=
• In-reply-to: <001d01c53e37$517dced0$0200a8c0@amd643200>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <001d01c53e37$517dced0$0200a8c0@amd643200>
• Reply-to: R L <fedora26@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Apr 10, 2005 9:39 PM, FreeUNIX System Administrator
<stacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> instead of patch from 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7, the correct procedure is patch
> from 2.6.11 to 2.6.11.7 by
> using the official patch file from kernel.org.
> 
> 

Oh, I see now. Thanks for the clear explanation.  So 2.6.11.x are like
mini-patches.

• Follow-Ups:
  • assigning who gets sda...sdb... etc.?
    • From: Peter Teuben

• References:
  • Patching 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7
    • From: R L
  • Re: Patching 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7
    • From: FreeUNIX System Administrator

• Prev by Date: Re: wireless
• Next by Date: Re: No Sound for Soundcard
• Previous by thread: Re: Patching 2.6.11.6 to 2.6.11.7
• Next by thread: assigning who gets sda...sdb... etc.?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread