On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:16, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >Am Mi, den 23.03.2005 schrieb Gene Heskett um 16:36: >> >Gene, >> > >> >I always have a problem to get the reply to your postings to your >> >reply-to address. Do others share that problem? >> >> What are you seeing as a replyto: address? IIRC I've got >> something that *was* legal at one time in there. > >Hi Gene :) > >Antwort an: gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core > releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >"Antwort an:" is German from my Evolution and meand "reply to:". I > guess you did set in your mail client the reply-to field > explicitly. This may be because you like to get replies to your > list postings not only over the list subscription but too as a > reply to your mail address directly. That may be a reason. The list > manager (mailman) on the Red Hat server sets the reply-to address > automatically, and I think if there is already one set, then the > Fedora list address is added. We see the same with people mailing > with Gmail (through the web frontend). >Sidenote: if your reply-to address does not differ your sender > address, and given the reason I explained above (direct reply > rather than list only) is not given, you do not need to set the > reply-to in your mail client. Just leave it empty. > Humm, I just cleared it, but IIRC that also led to problems a year or so back, and that was the reason I set it at that time. But we'll see how this works for a few days anyway, unless something blows up big time. I appreciate the help, thanks a bunch Alexander. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
