On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:46, Fons van der Beek wrote: > Many users are used to the stable products like RedHat 8 and 9, not to the > experimental positioning of Fedora.... > My 2 cents... I am not sure that FC 1 has been any more or less stable than RHL 8 or 9 (certainly FC 2 has been interesting, but that's a whole new kernel and expected to have some rough edges).... Since the release of Advanced Server and the "rename" to RHEL years ago, it has always been abundantly clear that RHL was a "test-bed" for RHEL. Just 'cause it's name changed in October and RedHat is opening up the process (albeit painfully slowly) more to the community, I just do not see that much of a difference. Remember it's not a free ride, but a freedom of choice. Sorry for floating so far off topic on this thread.... --Rob
