> Given the track record with redhat of how often upgrades go wrong, and > the fact that such an upgrade requires more downtime, I think a lot of > people will worry about that. > > Is fedora there to provide a good distro to users, or to exploit users > to redhat's commercial benefit? > > -- > > Sam Barnett-Cormack > Software Developer | Student of Physics & Maths > UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk) | Lancaster University Is it just me or do others get the sense that some people on this list feel that the fedora developers owe us a stable, easy to use, easy to upgrade, rock solid distro? Fedora as a community distro is only as good as the community. Have you tested the upgrade path? Have you donated money, or time in a meaningful way to make sure fedora has a clear and bug free upgrade path? If not then I wouldn't be complaining about the upgrade capabilities.
