as per the Red Hat wish list for Fedora, they mean to make it a "General Purpose" OS for everyones need. But will it really be ? They and Fedora Project has clearly mentioned that the releases will be on bleeding edge release of packages. Doesn't it seem to be a all time Beta OS ( Or I should say Red Hat Beta Release). It doesn't have a structure like Debian of having stable, testing and unstable which IMHO should be. ritesh On 12 Jan 2004, Gene Delitzoy wrote: > > > Given the track record with redhat of how often upgrades go wrong, and > > the fact that such an upgrade requires more downtime, I think a lot of > > people will worry about that. > > > > Is fedora there to provide a good distro to users, or to exploit users > > to redhat's commercial benefit? > > > > -- > > > > Sam Barnett-Cormack > > Software Developer | Student of Physics & Maths > > UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk) | Lancaster University > > Is it just me or do others get the sense that some people on this list > feel that the fedora developers owe us a stable, easy to use, easy to > upgrade, rock solid distro? > > Fedora as a community distro is only as good as the community. > > Have you tested the upgrade path? Have you donated money, or time in a > meaningful way to make sure fedora has a clear and bug free upgrade > path? > If not then I wouldn't be complaining about the upgrade capabilities. > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
