On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:09:16 +0300
Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
>
> Can't comment this patch, but if we can get rid of the work_struct - good!
>
> > -static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
> > +void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> > {
> > - struct net_bridge_port *p;
> > - struct net_device *dev;
> > - struct net_bridge *br;
> > -
> > - dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port,
> > - carrier_check.work)->dev;
> > - work_release(work);
>
> May I ask you to redo this patch on top of
>
> [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117183517612775
>
> ?
>
> We are removing the _NAR stuff, it would be nice to do this in a separate
> patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Oleg.
I would rather put it in a bugfix patchset for 2.6.21 and 2.6.20-stable
--
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
