Am 11.02.2007 20:42 schrieb Pavel Machek: [...] >> What about this: >> >> "If the device requires that, implement .suspend and .resume or at least >> define .suspend that will always return -ENOSYS (then people will know they >> have to unload the driver before the suspend). Similarly, if you aren't sure >> whether or not the device requires .suspend and .resume, define .suspend that >> will always return -ENOSYS." > > Sounds ok to me. Where should this text go? > Documentation/SubmittingDrivers ? Documentation/power/devices.txt? -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany - In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- Prev by Date: Multicast "ipmr.c" misunderstood / bug / new feature.
- Next by Date: Re: sata_nv - ADMA issues with 2.6.20
- Previous by thread: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- Next by thread: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- Index(es):
 |