On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:57 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm
> wrong)..
>
> Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
> implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
> putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?
to a large degree, a device driver that doesn't suspend is better than
no device driver at all, right?
now.. if you want to make the core warn about it, that's very fair
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
