NAK new drivers without proper power management?

Hi.

I don't think this is already done (feel free to correct me if I'm
wrong)..

Can we start to NAK new drivers that don't have proper power management
implemented? There really is no excuse for writing a new driver and not
putting .suspend and .resume methods in anymore, is there?

Regards,

Nigel-getting-sick-of-drivers-without-pm-support Cunningham

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] d80211 based driver for Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
• Next by Date: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
• Previous by thread: [ANNOUNCE] d80211 based driver for Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
• Next by thread: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]