* Mathieu Desnoyers ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > OK, well one problem is that it can cause a resched event to be lost, so
> > you might say it has more side-effects without checking resched.
> >
[...]
> If we are sure that we expect calls to preempt_schedule() from each of these
> contexts, then it's ok to put preempt_enable(). It is important to note that a
> marker would then act as a source of scheduler events in code paths where
> disabling interrupts is expected to disable the scheduler.
>
Sorry for self-reply, but the above mentioned issue is dealt by the
irqs_disabled() check at the beginning of preempt_schedule().
Mathieu
--
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
