Re: [PATCH 05/05] update - Linux Kernel Markers, non optimised architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nick Piggin ([email protected]) wrote:
> OK, well one problem is that it can cause a resched event to be lost, so
> you might say it has more side-effects without checking resched.
> 

Here is the patch that implements this. I also did a cosmetic change to
linux/marker.h. Preliminary tests of running the markers with preempt_enable()
with LTTng 0.6.56 instrumentation shows no problem.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

--- a/include/asm-generic/marker.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/marker.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct __mark_marker {
 		if (unlikely(__marker_enable_##name)) { \
 			preempt_disable(); \
 			(*__mark_call_##name)(format, ## args); \
-			preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
+			preempt_enable(); \
 		} \
 	} while (0)
 
--- a/include/asm-i386/marker.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/marker.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct __mark_marker {
 		if (unlikely(condition)) { \
 			preempt_disable(); \
 			(*__mark_call_##name)(format, ## args); \
-			preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
+			preempt_enable(); \
 		} \
 	} while (0)
 
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/marker.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/marker.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct __mark_marker {
 		if (unlikely(condition)) { \
 			preempt_disable(); \
 			(*__mark_call_##name)(format, ## args); \
-			preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
+			preempt_enable(); \
 		} \
 	} while (0)
 
--- a/include/linux/marker.h
+++ b/include/linux/marker.h
@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
  *
  * Example :
  *
- * MARK(subsystem_event, "%d %s %p[struct task_struct *]",
+ * MARK(subsystem_event, "%d %s %p[struct task_struct]",
  *   someint, somestring, current);
  * Where :
  * - Subsystem is the name of your subsystem.
  * - event is the name of the event to mark.
- * - "%d %s %p[struct task_struct *]" is the formatted string for printk.
+ * - "%d %s %p[struct task_struct]" is the formatted string for printk.
  * - someint is an integer.
  * - somestring is a char pointer.
  * - current is a pointer to a struct task_struct.
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
  * Markers can be put in inline functions, inlined static functions and
  * unrolled loops.
  *
+ * Note : It is safe to put markers within preempt-safe code : preempt_enable()
+ * will not call the scheduler due to the tests in preempt_schedule().
+ *
  * (C) Copyright 2006 Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  *
  * This file is released under the GPLv2.
-- 
OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux