Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff

> Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.
>

Semantically that sounds correct. But the intension of the caller as in
our case could be to convert the timespec to nsec_t. Calling
set_normalized_timespec() might be an overhead in this case. 

Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kexec for ia64
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement swap prefetching tweaks
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]