Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff

• To: "Lee Revell" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• From: "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:12:24 +0530
• Cc: [email protected], linux-kernel <[email protected]>, "Arjan van de Ven" <[email protected]>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=scD2DFbt2OGvIkKiBMPW/OBNuxSG8MfMExEBjRpkH3oeg24VYyd3PH9aB9hDFZkLXDlSr3153wicua4U/rsBK9ug4rNzX0kM7Fq+PGx3/vfCTBw2+rHaN5fAam/m7RjJaQMALvtUl76Hgg02ZYNLmUldtIXu5E9AREpaK4jOKK0=
• In-reply-to: <1142298764.13256.73.camel@mindpipe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1142298072.13256.70.camel@mindpipe> <[email protected]> <1142298764.13256.73.camel@mindpipe>
• Reply-to: [email protected]
• Sender: [email protected]

> You don't think it's a problem that 2.0000001s - 1.9999999s would return
> garbage rather than 0.0000002?
>
> Lee
>

The caller can use set_normalized_timespec() to fix that.

Warm Regards,
Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
• Next by Date: Re: xen DMA bug
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]