Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff

Balbir Singh wrote:

You don't think it's a problem that 2.0000001s - 1.9999999s would return
garbage rather than 0.0000002?

Sorry....you're right. I was thinking of invalid deltas (where end was before start).

Lee

The caller can use set_normalized_timespec() to fix that.

Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.

Will fix.
Thanks,
Shailabh

Warm Regards,
Balbir

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
    • From: "Balbir Singh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]