Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 17:04 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:

> cond_resched is really a temporary hack to make the desktop usable until
> the kernel becomes fully preemptible.

...and my argument is that we should avoid adding yet another load of
scheduling hacks deep in unrelated code in order to satisfy yet another
minority of users. The Linux way has always been to emphasise
maintainability, and hence clean coding, over functionality.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nfs insecure_locks / Tru64 behaviour
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] - Fix memory ordering problem in wake_futex()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]