Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 13:26 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:


Then have io_schedule() automatically set that flag, and convert NFS to
use io_schedule(), or something along those lines. I don't want a bunch
of RT-specific flags littering the NFS/RPC code.

This flag isn't RT-specific. It's used in the scheduling SCHED_NORMAL tasks and has no other semantic effects.


It still has sod all business being in the NFS code. We don't touch task
scheduling in the filesystem code.

How do you explain the use of the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE flag then?

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   [email protected]

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux