Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 22:08 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:07 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> > By your logic it's also broken to use cond_resched() in filesystem code.
> 
> ...and your point is?

Reductio ad absurdum.  Subsystems not using cond_resched would render
Linux unusable for even trivial soft realtime applications like AV
playback and recording.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]