Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

not a post-2.6.14 regression



Well yeah.  But that doesn't mean thse things have lower priority that
post-2.6.14 regressions.

I understand what you're doing here, but we should in general concentrate
upon the most severe bugs rather than upon the most recent..

Hypocratic oath: "First, do no harm."

If a new kernel version can't make things *better*, at least it shouldn't make them *worse*. New features are good, performance improvements are good, breaking working systems with an update is not good.

I'm with Adrian on this, if you want people to test and report with -rc kernels, then there should be some urgency to addressing the reported problems.
--
   -bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux