Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> not a post-2.6.14 regression
>

Well yeah.  But that doesn't mean thse things have lower priority that
post-2.6.14 regressions.

I understand what you're doing here, but we should in general concentrate
upon the most severe bugs rather than upon the most recent..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linux 2.6.15-rc6
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] msi vector targeting abstractions
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]