On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:52:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The following bugs in the kernel Bugzilla [1] contain regressions in
> > 2.6.15-rc compared to 2.6.14 with patches:
>
> Thanks for tracking this. Although I fear it won't come to much.
People had been complaining about a lack of testing prior to the final
release of a kernel.
If this was meant serious, we should try hard to fix all regressions
reported by people who do test -rc and -git kernels.
> non-bugzilla post-2.6.14 bugs which I've squirelled away include:
>
>
> From: Brice Goglin <[email protected]>
> Subject: Linux 2.6.14: Badness in as-iosched
As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression.
Besides this, Jens (Cc'ed) sent a patch for it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/20/119
Was there a reason why it wasn't applied?
> From: Charles-Edouard Ruault <[email protected]>
> Subject: [BUG] kernel 2.6.14.2 breaks IPSEC
As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression.
And reading the discussion on netdev, it seems this wasn't ever expected
to work without additional netfilter patches.
> From: Michael Madore <[email protected]>
> Subject: USB handoff, irq 193: nobody cared!
If this is still present, David should look into it:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0511.1/2243.html
> From: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>
> Subject: BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling
If this affects Linus' tree, a patch for it is in -mm.
> From: Miles Lane <[email protected]>
> Subject: 2.6.15-rc2-git6 + ipw2200 1.0.8 -- Slab corruption
As the subject says, this is a problem when using an external version of
this driver.
> From: "Gottfried Haider" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [2.6.15-rc2] 8139too probe fails (pci related?)
According to the report perhaps not a post-2.6.14 regression.
But anyways, this should be better debugged.
@Gottfried:
Does it work with kernel 2.6.14.4?
Does it work with kernel 2.6.15-rc6?
If it stil fails, can you send a complete dmesg for 2.6.15-rc6?
> From: Steve Work <[email protected]>
> Subject: Multi-thread corefiles broken since April
As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression.
> From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
> Subject: Oops with w9968cf
@Luca, Greg:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/91
> From: John Reiser <[email protected]>
> Subject: control placement of vDSO page
This is not a post-2.6.14 regression.
> From: "P. Christeas" <[email protected]>
> Subject: No sound from CX23880 tuner w. 2.6.15-rc5
No answer by the submitter when being asked for more information.
> Subject: x86_64 timekeeping buglets
> From: Jim Houston <[email protected]>
Reported against 2.6.13, therefore not a post-2.6.14 regression.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
