Pekka Enberg wrote:
>Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
>>>There's also the custom list, hash and debug code. We should either
>>>
>>>a) remove them or
>>>
>>>b) generify them and submit as standalone works or
>>>
>>>c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is.
>>>
>>>
>
>On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>either b) or c) is ok with me for the list code. The debug code should
>>be c) I think.
>>
>>Probably vs can offer a more detailed and accurate opinion,
>>
>>
>
>I completely agree that the current state of the generic hashing
>facilities is somewhat poor but I fail to see why you can't use
><linux/list.h>.
>
>
I'll let vs and maybe nikita comment.
>As for the debugging code, I would love to see that turned into
>something generic (every subsystem has their own now) but it is
>definitely not something that should stop you from merging.
>
> Pekka
>
>
>
>
If I encourage you to make a patch, is that ok of me?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
