On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:34:50PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: >David Masover <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think Hans (or someone) decided that when hardware stops working, it's >> not the job of the FS to compensate, it's the job of lower layers, or >> better, the job of the admin to replace the disk and restore from >> backups. >Handling other people's data this way is just reckless irresponsibility. >Sure, you can get high performance if you just forego some of your basic >responsibilities. Your honest-to-bog opinion is that the FS vendor is responsible for the admin not taking backups or the hardware vendor shipping crap? *still trying to understand how that can be* -- mjt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- References:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
- Next by Date: [PATCH] fs:lock_rename()/unlock_rename() can lead to deadlock in distributed fs.
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Index(es):
 |